BEACON EMR HIPAA Disclaimer Site Map Social Media
BayCare Health System
Community Benefit Financial Assistance Policy Quality Report Card Health Library News Doctor Connect Find Us
Services Hospitals Find A Doctor Classes & Events About Us Careers Contact Us Get E-Newsletter
HealthDay Articles & Information
 Back  Back


May We Help You?
 

Call 1-877-692-2922
Monday-Friday, 8am to 5pm

Persons with hearing and speech disabilities can reach the above number through TDD and other specialized equipment by calling the Florida Relay Service at 711.

Contact Us
Send 
e-mail
Search jobs


Decrease (-) Restore Default Increase (+) Font Size
Print    Email
Search Health Information   

Electronic Health Records May Slow Rise of Health-Care Costs

Study found small but measurable savings in 3 Mass. communities that have embraced the technology

TUESDAY, July 16 (HealthDay News) -- The use of electronic health records can cut the costs of outpatient care by about 3 percent, compared with traditional paper records, a new study suggests.

Outpatient care includes doctor's visits, and laboratory, pharmacy and radiology services typically ordered during those visits.

University of Michigan researchers compared the health-care costs of 179,000 patients in three Massachusetts communities where electronic health records were widely adopted and six communities where that was not the case.

On average, health-care costs in the three communities -- Brockton, Newburyport and North Adams -- where electronic health records were widely used were $5.14 less per patient per month than in those communities that still relied on paper records, the study found.

Most of the savings were in radiology. This may be because doctors ordered fewer medical imaging tests since electronic health records gave them better access to patients' medical histories, according to study leader Julia Adler-Milstein, an assistant professor in the U-M School of Information and School of Public Health.

"To me, this is good news. We found 3 percent savings and while that might not sound huge, if it could be sustained or even increased, it would be a substantial amount," she said in a university news release.

"That said, when we talk about cost savings, it does not mean that the costs went down, but that the costs did not go up as quickly in the intervention communities. This suggests that adopting electronic records helped slow the rise in health-care costs," Adler-Milstein added.

The study findings were published in the July 16 issue of the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.

Opponents of the use of taxpayer dollars to fund electronic health records contend that these systems might boost costs by making it easier to order tests and could be used to justify higher reimbursement.

"I think our findings are significant because we provide evidence to support the use of taxpayer dollars to invest in electronic health records," Adler-Milstein said. "We really have not had compelling evidence that proved that they would save money. It was assumed, but there are a lot of skeptics. This study helps clarify whether there are cost savings and what the magnitude of those are in the near-term."

More information

You can learn more about electronic health records at the U.S. government's HealthIT.gov website.


SOURCE: University of Michigan, news release, July 15, 2013

Health News Copyright © 2013 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Serving The Tampa Bay Area © Copyright 2014 BayCare Health System